Introductory essays
My riveting book that explains our current world
"The Struggle for Utopia - A History of Jewish, Christian and Islamic Messianism" by Arnold Slyper. Wonderful reviews. Available on Amazon, at US bookstores, and at Pomeranz Bookseller in Jerusalem (with courier service available). " Brilliant and thought-provoking."
An introduction to this website
This introductory chapter describes the author's personal struggle to reconcile the Genesis creation narratives with modern science and his growing doubts about the Torah's divine authorship. The turning point came through the writings of Nahum Sarna and Umberto Cassuto, who argued that the early chapters of Genesis should be understood as literary anti-myths that respond to ancient Mesopotamian beliefs rather than as scientific accounts of creation. Building on Cassuto's literary approach, the author concludes that the Torah is a unified, sophisticated work whose repeated themes, divine names, and literary structure reveal its central concern: the relationship between God and humanity. The book argues that many early Genesis narratives are allegorical, that they must be read in their ancient Near Eastern context, and that understanding Mesopotamian mythology is often essential for appreciating their theological message. Throughout, the author seeks to demonstrate the literary unity of the Torah and show how each narrative contributes to its overarching ethical and theological vision.
Click here to read "An introduction to this website."
A critique of the documentary hypothesis
This essay argues that the Torah is a divine text written by Moses at God’s command, and it rejects higher biblical criticism which claims the Torah was composed from multiple human sources (J, E, P, D) and edited much later. It critiques the documentary hypothesis on several grounds: the absence of any ancient Jewish tradition mentioning multiple Torah versions, the improbability that a nation would accept a newly-composed scripture, and the implausibility of a Redactor weaving together separate sources without any record of him doing this. Archaeological, historical, and biblical evidence is presented that Israelites in the early biblical period possessed a known “book of the Torah” and practiced its laws, implying a continuous tradition rather than a late composition. Drawing on the scholarship of Umberto Cassuto, the essay argues that variations such as the divine names YHWH and Elohim reflect theological nuance and literary purpose, and not multiple authors. Ultimately, the essay maintains that the Torah’s coherence, literary sophistication, fulfilled prophecies, and the historical survival and restoration of the Jewish people support its divine origin rather than human compilation.
​
Click here to read on "A critique of the documentary hypothesis"
The Importance of the Names of God in the Torah
This essay explores the two names of God in the Torah, Elohim and YHWH, which represent different relationships between God and humanity. Elohim is the universal God who created the world, and is distant and transcendent, while YHWH is the immanent, personal God concerned with individual moral progress and Israel's destiny. This essay challenges the documentary hypothesis, which attributes the different names of God to distinct literary sources, supporting instead the idea that the names reflect varying attributes of God. Umberto Cassuto's rejection of the documentary hypothesis is highlighted, emphasizing his belief in divine authorship and the different ways God interacts with humanity. Ultimately, the two names express both the universal and personal aspects of God's relationship with the world, offering ancient people a revolutionary understanding of a singular, multifaceted deity.
Click here to read on "The importance of the names of God in the Torah"
​
Allegory in the Early Stories of Genesis
This essay argues that the earliest stories in Genesis—such as Eden, Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, and Noah’s flood—are best understood as allegorical, citing symbolic names, implausible narratives, and archaeological difficulties with literal readings. It notes that ancient audiences were comfortable with such allegories, as seen in parallels like the Gilgamesh flood story. Despite this, rabbinic and medieval Jewish commentators generally insisted on literal or harmonized interpretations to avoid internal contradictions. The essay explains that their resistance to allegory stemmed from fear of erasing the boundary between myth and history. The author concludes that while the primeval stories may be allegorical, history begins with Abraham, whose reality—and that of Moses and the Exodus—is affirmed as a matter of faith.
Click here to read on "Allegory in the early Stories of Genesis"​
​